Others strive to design, build, and operate experiments that may someday determine the nature of nonbaryonic dark matter, or at least eliminate from contention some of the hypothetical particles that elementary-particle physicists have proposed.
Before surveying those experiments and the hypotheses that motivate them, it’s worth noting that a few ingenious minds will have none of the dark-matter mystery. Instead, they suggest, the observations show merely that physicists don’t yet fully understand gravity. Suppose that at the greatest cosmic distances, gravitational forces deviate slightly from what Newton proposed and Einstein refined. In that case, the motions of stars and galaxies might not reflect the existence of enormous quantities of dark matter, but rather the simple refusal of the universe to obey what physicists presume to be the laws of nature.
The Israeli physicist Mordehai Milgrom of the Weizmann Institute in Rehovot, Israel, proposed that approach, and for a time his idea seemed to explain the observational results without recourse to much dark matter. But to many astronomers now, Milgrom’s idea seems on the verge of being disproved. Increasingly accurate observations of stellar and galactic motions at various distance scales seem to confirm existing theories of gravity.
If Einstein’s theory of gravity is correct, as appears to be the case, then nonbaryonic matter—matter forever different from all known matter—has always ruled the universe. And the best hope for discovering just what form it takes now rests on finding some of it—at least a tiny amount!—here on Earth. But that poses a dilemma. The basic nature of nonbaryonic dark matter, its extreme unwillingness to engage in any interactions with ordinary particles, makes it extremely difficult to detect.
The dark-matter community, fully aware of the difficulties, has concentrated on experiments designed to find the leading dark-matter candidates. The candidates come in two categories: relatively large objects, and submicroscopic elementary particles, which would have to exist in huge quantities. The sizable dark-matter candidates have the generic name MACHOs, short for “massive compact halo objects.” MACHOs might be black holes with masses something like that of a star; or smaller, more numerous black holes with masses similar to those of planets; or perhaps the cores of burned-out stars that collapsed but did not form black holes. Gravitational lensing can reveal MACHOs, and astronomers have even found a few with starlike masses. But the results so far imply that MACHOs cannot supply the bulk of the cosmic mass.
If so, the best hopes lie with nonbaryonic elementary particles, which exist so far only in theory. But some of the theories predicting their existence display promising elegance and symmetry, so particles are the favored dark-matter candidates. Two kinds of hypothetical particles seem the most appealing.
First is the axion, a particle named after a laundry detergent, because its hypothetical properties cleaned up a conflict between a theory known as quantum chromodynamics and certain experimental results. Each axion would have an exceedingly small mass—less than a millionth of the electron’s own tiny mass.
If axions do exist and throng our galaxy, they must occasionally be scattered by the magnetic fields that permeate the Milky Way. The scatterings would generate radio waves at a frequency that depends on the small (and unknown) mass of the axion. The world’s most advanced axion detector, at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, seeks those radio waves by searching a wide band of possible frequencies with supremely sensitive amplifiers. So far, all axion searches have proven fruitless, but the search goes on.
If not axions, why not WIMPs? The name stands for “weakly interacting massive particle”—a concise description of the second leading candidate among hypothetical dark-matter particles. “Weakly interacting” means interacting mainly via the weak force, the force responsible for certain kinds of atomic “decay” and the least familiar of the four fundamental forces in nature. “Massive” in this context means “at least a few dozen times the mass of a proton.” (The name “MACHOs,” for dark-matter black holes, was chosen to contrast with “WIMPs,” which was proposed first.) Because WIMPs arise from the predictions within a class of persuasive theories of elementary particles called supersymmetric, many particle theorists think WIMPs exist.
To find the elusive WIMPs, experimental physicists are betting on the likelihood that, once in a blue moon, a WIMP will collide with ordinary matter. Such a collision would lead to a wimpy—as in “amazingly small”—effect in the bowels of a WIMP detector, so extraordinary measures must be taken if physicists hope to notice it. Experimenters reduce the normal atomic vibrations of the sensors within the detector as far as possible by cooling the sensors close to absolute zero. Placing the apparatus deep underground shields it from interference from less penetrating potential sources of spurious signals, such as the cosmic rays that continuously bombard the Earth.
At least half a dozen competing teams of experimenters from Europe and the United States are now operating and improving their WIMP detectors, which build on two basic designs. In the first design, the sensors are several dozen crystals, each weighing about a kilogram, made of highly purified germanium or silicon. Two detectors employ that design, one inside the Gran Sasso tunnel, nearly a mile beneath Italy’s Apennine mountains, and the other at the bottom of a decommissioned mine in northern Minnesota. If a WIMP strikes an atom in one of the crystals, the crystal should ever so slightly heat up and vibrate. So far the crystal detectors have found no WIMPs, but the crystals may well fail to provide a sufficiently large target to succeed in only a year or two of operation.
To increase their chances of registering WIMP impacts, the experimenters naturally would like to enlarge the target, but with crystal-based detectors, that poses technological difficulties. Enter the second, and newer, kind of WIMP detector, whose target is a pool of ultra-pure, liquefied inert gas. Ongoing experiments with liquefied argon or xenon detectors now operate within the Boulby mine in Yorkshire, England, and in the Gran Sasso tunnel.
Like the crystal detectors, the inert-gas detectors have yet to register a single WIMP. Nevertheless, experimenters have high hopes for success with the design, because they can scale up inert-gas detectors with relative ease. The next generation will deploy not a few kilograms but a few hundred kilograms of target material. Elena Aprile, a physicist at Columbia University who leads the attempt to find a xenon-bumping WIMP in the Gran Sasso tunnel, hopes for a sizable gain in sensitivity by the end of 2008.
In short, attempts to find the elusive particles of dark matter have so far yielded only hope and construction contracts. In more scientific language, the experimentally established upper limits on the tendency of WIMPs or axions to interact with ordinary matter have grown progressively smaller. So far those upper limits do not rule out the viability of either of these dark-matter candidates. No one can say, just yet, that axions or WIMPs do not exist in sufficient numbers, and with enough mass per particle, to account for the bulk of the nonbaryonic dark matter.
Experimenters working with both kinds of dark-matter detectors know that a formidable competitor looms on the horizon. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), built at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, just outside Geneva, is now scheduled to begin serious operation in mid-2008. Once up and running, the LHC will be the world’s biggest particle accelerator. Dug several hundred feet under the Swiss and French countryside, it will accelerate two clumps, or “beams,” of particles many times around a ring more than five miles across, before smashing the two beams into each other.
Although the LHC was not designed to search for dark matter, its collisions will give birth to the most massive particles ever generated in any machine. If the LHC can verify supersymmetric particle theories, as expected, it will confirm WIMPs as real. Naturally, the builders of dark-matter detectors, currently stymied in their searches for axions and WIMPs, would like nothing better than to find the dark matter before the LHC can make its roundabout confirmation-by-implication.
They must hurry. Bernard Sadoulet, a physicist at the University of California, Berkeley, who has become the grand old man of dark-matter detection, thinks physics has a “decent chance” of ruling axions and WIMPs in or out of contention in the next five years.
And what if more sensitive experiments show that neither axions nor WIMPs can explain the dark matter? Life will go on, and so will the universe, most of it made of dark matter of unknown form, just as it is today. Inventive theorists will suggest new possibilities, and experimentally minded particle physicists will improve their detectors and their analyses. And both theorists and experimenters will continue to work in the hope that they will be the fortunate ones to resolve this fundamental cosmic mystery. Two hundred fifty years ago, the town of Whitby, in Yorkshire, produced James Cook, arguably the greatest explorer of Earth. Perhaps in the next five years the dark-matter experimenters in the Boulby mine, near Whitby, will be able to announce one of the greatest discoveries about the cosmos: the nature of dark matter.